Keynote Speakers

ELSA ARCAUTE

University Collage London, UK

Urban systems, as complex adaptive networks, exhibit interdependencies and heterogeneous patterns of connectivity and accessibility. These characteristics give rise to hierarchical structures, where structural changes emerge at distinct scales. In this talk, we propose a multiscalar, relational framework for detecting these shifts and identifying scale-specific vulnerabilities in accessibility. This work reveals leverage points for targeted, resilience-oriented interventions.

ALAIN BARRAT

CNRS / Centre de Physique Théorique / Turin Center for Living Systems, Marseille, France

Computational models offer a crucial setting to test strategies to mitigate the spread of infectious diseases, providing useful insights to applied public health. To be actionable, models need to be informed by data that describe the structure of interactions between individuals. While data coming from different sources and at different resolutions have become increasingly available, their integration into computational frameworks poses a number of challenges.

I will first give an example of how high resolution data sets can be used to build realistic agent-based models, suggest, evaluate and compare various mitigation strategies. As such detailed data sets are however rarely available, I will also discuss whether models fed with less detailed data lead to the same actionable conclusions. Finally, while most studies focus on how the structure of contacts shapes the spread of a disease, I will address a reverse question: do different spreading processes unfolding on a network lead to the same propagation patterns? This has consequences in the role of models in decision-making, as many results on propagation patterns and on the identification of structures with high spreading power or to monitor in surveillance programs are typically obtained using very simplified contagion processes. Our results imply in particular that numerical simulations using simplified settings can bring important insights even in the case of a new emerging disease whose properties are not yet well known. I will conclude with some perspectives on new avenues in the modeling of spreading phenomena.

HUGUES BERSINI

FARI Institute of AI for the public goods, director of the IRIDIA AI Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles,  Belgium

Lorsqu’on s’intéresse de près aux phénomènes biologiques, mon exposé montrera que des notions comme la stabilisation dans le temps et dans l’espace d’un système dynamique, sa préservation et sa viabilité, son individuation avant même l’apparition d’un génome unique, la diversité de ses composants, l’ouverture et la métabolisation des intrants,  le processus d’acceptation et celui de rejets des impacts extérieurs à même de le déstabiliser, le regroupement spontané de plusieurs composants afin d’améliorer encore l’adaptation du tout et les conflits qui peuvent apparaître entre ces regroupements pour des ressources convoitées, peuvent faire comme un écho aux discussions et disputes que le concept d’identité provoque cette fois dans l’univers des sciences humaines. Cet exposé sera aussi un hommage à Francisco Varela dont les recherches à Paris s’étaient envolées dans toutes les directions, démontrant une volonté constante et farouche de réimprimer l’humain dans sa biologie, son esprit au cerveau et au vivant, la maladie à la déstabilisation d’un réseau immunitaire, et aussi de questionner cette notion d’identité, autant dans ses expériences de vie et de méditation qu’au cœur même de ses recherches, m’offrant au passage de l’accompagner dans certaines d’entre elles.

YAMIR MORENO

Director of the Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Zaragoza, Spain

Current Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for modeling complex social dynamics. In particular, LLM-driven agents provide a unique opportunity to explore several phenomena in artificial societies. Admittedly, recent advancements have demonstrated that LLMs can exhibit human-like behaviors, including cooperation, fairness, and adherence to social norms. However, they also present significant challenges, such as sensitivity to prompt design, hallucinations, and inconsistencies in decision-making. In this talk, we discuss the capacity of GABMs to reproduce behavioral experiments and compare findings on cooperation and reputation dynamics in human groups with those obtained by implementing a reputation-based game in which LLM-driven agents played the Prisoner’s Dilemma on dynamics networks. Our results indicate that LLM-based agents can partially reproduce human cooperative behavior and network dynamics, though important limitations remain. These models will become increasingly integrated into decision-making processes, thus, understanding their constraints and interaction patterns with humans and artificial agents is crucial.

CAMILLE ROTH

CNRS & EHESS, Centre d’analyse et de mathématique sociales, Paris, France

Echo chambers refer to the existence of cohesive groups of actors who principally interact with same-minded people. Are they ubiquitous in social media? It might depend on which data one is looking at. At a more macro level, is the notion of online fragmentation, or the co-existence of communities between which there are few bridges, at odds with the idea that online spaces foster global arenas ? It might also depend on how data is filtered. The term of filter bubbles describes the possibility that algorithmic personalization would confine users to consumption of content they are most comfortable with. Is it a necessary behavior of recommendation algorithms? Again, it might depend. We will review these three connected contemporary debates on the social dynamics of online communities, whereby the literature appears to bring conflicting results and where, we argue, the way data are being appraised may play a key role. 

FLAMINIO SQUAZZONI 

Professor of Sociology, Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan

tba

https://behavelab.org/flaminio-squazzoni/

ELISA THÉBAULT

CNRS, Institut d’écologie et des science de l’environnement, Paris, France

The consequences of diversity and food web structure on the stability of ecological communities have been debated for more than 5 decades. While the understanding of the relation between diversity and the stability of properties at community and ecosystem levels has gained from joint empirical, experimental and theoretical insights, the question of the relation between food web structure and stability has received almost exclusively theoretical attention. The lack of empirical studies on this issue is partly due to the fact that theoretical studies are often disconnected from the stability of natural ecosystems, and to the difficulty of describing and manipulating food web structure in the field. Here I will present results based on both theoretical food web models and data analyses of time-series of fish communities across France, aiming to investigate in parallel the relations between diversity, food web structure and the stability of ecosystem properties.

Invited Speakers

GIULIA CENCETTI

Université Aix Marseille, Université de Toulon, France

Analysing temporal networks and hypergraphs to generate realistic surrogates induces us to reflect about the set of intrinsic relationships that shape an evolving network. These involve temporal and topological causalities and correlations concerning nodes activity and hyperedges appearance. We observe how the individual nodes dynamics is linked to that of neighbouring nodes but is also influenced by the global topology. Analogously, the local topology at each time is affected both by the interactions of the few previous time steps and by long-term temporal correlations. In this context we develop a framework to generate temporal networks and hypergraphs, both based on the observation of real-world temporal networks given as input. This methodology will allow to obtain surrogate temporal networks or hypergraphs to replace real data when the latter are not usable or sharable (particularly useful for social data, often subject to privacy issues). It additionally provides an important tool for data augmentation, allowing us to generate temporal networks with an arbitrary number of nodes and time span, using as input original patterns extracted from available datasets of limited size. The versatility of the obtained methods allows us to combine multiple input temporal networks, for instance different social contexts, thus simulating a complete society resulting from the integration of different social settings (e.g., schools, workplaces, hospitals, etc.). This represents an additional mechanism to overcome the incompleteness of original data.

GUILLAUME DEFFUANT

INRAE, Clermont Ferrand

We live in an age of information abundance but know little about how this influences our opinions or attitudes. A common expectation is that people consulting numerous pieces of information, well balancing the different sides of an issue, will adopt a moderate attitude about the issue. We claim that this expectation is deceitful and suggest that, on the contrary, people tend to get extreme and dogmatic. The cause for this extremization is a hardening confirmation bias—when their attitude gets more extreme, people get more likely to ignore information that differs from their views. Our claim is supported by simulations of two fundamentally different computational models of an agent consulting information and holding a hardening confirmation bias. For both models, the initially moderate attitude of the agent tends to get extreme when the agent consults abundant unbiased information, while it remains moderate when consulting limited information. We analyze the extremization pathways displayed in the models and discuss how our results may affect views on polarization and on the role of online media.

BENJAMIN FAGARD 

CNRS Lattice Laboratory ENS

The existence of large language models makes it possible to imagine new ways of looking at language change. But much can still be done by using existing language corpora and models of language change. For instance, looking at changes in frequency alone, it has been shown that it is possible to identify ongoing language change, e.g. the competition between variants, which displays a characteristic ‘s-curve’. This concept is anything but new (Osgood & Sebeok 1954, Kroch 1989), but has been recently refined theoretically with more explicit models (Blythe & Croft 2012, Feltgen et al. 2017, Feltgen 2024), and used to identify cases of language change in large corpora (Boukhaled et al. 2019). A crucial question in that respect is whether it can be used not only to identify language change, but to distinguish between different types of change (viz. lexical innovation, borrowing, calques, grammaticalization). In my talk, I will address this question with data from large diachronic corpora.

References

Blythe, R. A. & W. Croft. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88(2), 269-304.

Boukhaled, M.A., Fagard, B. & T. Poibeau. 2019. The Dynamics of Semantic Change: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 11978, 1-15.

Feltgen, Q., B. Fagard & J.-P. Nadal. 2017. Frequency patterns of semantic change: Corpus-based evidence of a near-critical dynamics in language change. Royal society open science.

Feltgen, Quentin. 2024. Is language change chiefly a social diffusion affair? The role of entrenchment in frequency increase and in the emergence of complex structural patterns. Front. Complex Syst. 2:1327425.

Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language variation and change 1(3), 199–244.

CLAIRE LAGESSE 

CNRS, Théma, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France

PEDRO RAMACIOTTI MORALES 

Complex Systems Institute of Paris & Médialab, Sciences Po

Concerns about public online spaces have fuelled numerous studies on social media and algorithms. One leading type of concern regards phenomena such as informational segregation or polarisation. Numerous studies have addressed these questions at national level and on different platforms, but essential questions remain unanswered regarding the measurement and prevalence of these phenomena. One outstanding challenge is the comparative measurement of polarisation in reference frames that can be applied across national settings and time-frames. In this talk I explore how conceptual frameworks from sociology and political science–that have guided decades of advances in survey-based research–extend to the study of these online spaces, enabling the study of polarisation in multidimensional issue and ideology space, and on a multitude of countries and settings, from the study of algorithmic recommendation, to media outlet ecosystems, and online political mobilisation.

AGNIESZKA RUSINOWSKA

CNRS, CES, PSE, Université Paris 1, Paris, France

The aim of this talk is to provide a short overview of network-based and game-theoretic approaches to environmental decision-making. Their methodology based on cooperative game theory solutions and concepts from network theory have been applied, in particular, to supply chain management, cost-sharing problems in the context of river management, loss allocation in energy transmission networks, allocation of forest resources, responsibility in the context of hazardous transportation problems, allocation of the global carbon budget or carbon emission permits, and in the context of carbon tax reforms, among others. We are particularly interested in the problem of defining responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions which is a key issue in view of developing efficient climate regulation and monitoring its implementation. In this talk, I will focus on an axiomatic approach to measuring greenhouse gas emissions in production networks, addressing the issue of environmental responsibility both from theoretical and empirical points of view (van den Ende, Mandel and Rusinowska, 2025)